Reading time: 4 minutes
One of the first MPs of Indian heritage, Shapurji Saklatvala (1874–1936) was an agitator for change, which ultimately led to his surveillance by the Security Service.
Early life and family
Shapurji Saklatvala was born in India in 1874, the son of a merchant. His maternal uncle founded what is today the Tata group – a multinational conglomerate. Saklatvala worked for the company for part of his career, and first moved to England to run the Manchester office. After moving to England, he married Sarah Marsh, who came from a Derbyshire family, and they went on to have five children.
His return in the 1921 Census lists his occupation as ‘office manager’, living with his wife and children; it appears they had a few visitors to their home, too.
Parliament and surveillance
Saklatvala’s involvement in British politics began a few years later when he joined the Independent Labour Party’s Manchester branch. He was influenced by the Russian Revolution and the rise of communism, which ultimately led him to leave the party for the Communist Party of Great Britain when it was founded in 1920.
He stood for parliament, and was endorsed by Labour, in the October 1922 general election, winning the Battersea North seat. While he lost the seat in the election the following year, he then reclaimed it and remained an MP until 1929.
Like many other communists – and suspected communists – Saklatvala was watched closely by the Security Service. Communism was feared by many, especially the establishment, after witnessing the change in power and upheaval experienced as a result of the revolution in Russia.
The detailed surveillance carried out by the British state provides an enormous amount of detail about Saklatvala’s life and associations. Though our records on him only offer the state’s perspective, they are nevertheless a valuable insight into a man who agitated for change throughout the 1920s.
The Security Service file on Saklatvala from 1921 to 1932, during which time he was elected as an MP. Catalogue reference: KV 2/614.
‘An act of sedition’
From the records that we hold we know that Saklatvala was vocal on issues such as Indian and Irish independence, as well as decolonisation more generally. He was involved in many of the key political moments of the 1920s, for example he attended the 1921 Pan-African Congress.
- HO 144/6099 Home Office file on Shapurji Saklatvala’s arrest and imprisonment 1923 – 1926
Prison sentence
On Thursday 6 May 1926 at Bow Street Police Court, Chief Magistrate Sir Justice Chartres Biron made his decision on the case:
As proved (I have read it carefully through) I have no doubt in my mind, and no reasonable man could have any doubt, that this is a seditious speech, calculated to promote public disorder […] I shall therefore bind you over to keep the Peace and be of good behaviour for twelve months, and require you to find two sureties in £250 each, or go to prison for two months
Sir Justice Chartres Biron
Saklatvala said that it was impossible for him to comply and find sureties and therefore was sent to prison. Throughout his time in Wormwood Scrubs prison he tried to carry on his political work. He arranged for House of Commons debates to be sent to him and quoted precedence that would allow him to be released a day early and attend the House.
Like so many people during the 1920s, Shapurji Saklatvala agitated for change and for causes close to his heart. Whilst not everyone in society was in a position of influence as he was, many were vocal and demanded reform.
This article was originally published in The National Archives.
Articles you may also like:
Twelve days at Anzac: the evacuation
Over one hundred years ago, one of the most remarkable operations in military history occurred at the Dardanelles with the evacuation in December 1915 of 83,000 Australian, New Zealand, British and Indian troops from the Gallipoli Peninsula without a single loss of life. It will, as, one contemporary German correspondent reporting from the Turkish lines exclaimed, ‘stand before the eyes of all strategists as a hitherto unattained masterpiece’.
This article was first published by The National Archives. It is reproduced in accordance with the Open Government Licence v3.0.